Skip to main content

Promise vs. Reality:
How the Charter Movement Betrayed Its Own Vision

Promise vs. Reality:
How the Charter Movement Betrayed Its Own Vision

The Original Dream: Teacher-Led Innovation

In 1988, American Federation of Teachers president Al Shanker proposed a radical idea: Give teachers the freedom to create small, experimental schools within the public system. These teacher-led laboratories would develop innovative teaching methods and share their discoveries with all public schools. They would be partners, not competitors.

Shanker envisioned:

  • Small schools run by teachers, not corporations 
  • Collaboration with district schools, not competition
  • Sharing successful innovations with all public schools
  • Serving the hardest-to-reach students

The Corporate Takeover:
From Innovation to Privatization

What we got instead:

  • Massive corporate chains run by CEOs earning up to $1 million annually
  • Charter Management Organizations (CMOs) operating hundreds of schools
  • For-profit Education Management Organizations (EMOs) extracting public funds
  • Hedge fund managers and billionaires driving expansion

The Expansion Playbook:
How They Grew

Grade Level Manipulation

Charter operators exploit loopholes to expand without approval. They add grade levels never mentioned in their original applications, creating entirely new schools that were never authorized—all while circumventing the legal cap on charter schools.

Political Deals & Zombie Schools

In New York, a backroom deal made NYC the only district ineligible for state transition aid—costing public schools $2.81 billion since 2011. Meanwhile, "zombie charters" that previously failed can be revived, with $153 million diverted from public schools just for their facilities.
Kids with behavioral challenges

Billionaire
Backing

Republican megadonor Ken Griffin donated $25 million to Success Academy in 2023. The Walton Family Foundation has poured hundreds of millions into charter expansion nationwide. This isn't grassroots education reform—it's a well-funded privatization campaign.

Success Academy: A Case Study in Broken Promises

New York's largest charter network exemplifies everything wrong with the movement:

The Marketing: "Success for All Children"

The Reality:

  • Sued for dropping a special needs student at a police precinct
  • Caught maintaining a "Got to Go" list of students to push out
  • 15% annual teacher turnover rate (double that of public schools)
  • Audit found $624,342 in improper billing to taxpayers
  • Refused to cooperate with city comptroller investigations

The "No Excuses" Model: Compliance Over Education

Many charter chains adopted the "No Excuses" approach:
  • Military-style discipline for kindergarteners
  • Suspensions for minor infractions like talking in hallways
  • Public shaming and behavior tracking systems
  • Teaching to the test at the expense of art, music, and critical thinking

One parent's story: "My autistic kindergartener yelled 'OKAY!' in the hallway when he got excited. He was suspended. That's when I knew this wasn't about education."

The Teacher Exodus: Why Educators Are Fleeing

Charter School Reality for Teachers:
  • 24% annual turnover (double public schools)
  • 60+ hour work weeks with no overtime
  • Lower pay than district schools
  • Only 11% unionization rate
  • Constant pressure to boost test scores

The Hidden Cost: Each teacher who leaves costs up to $21,000 to replace. In high-turnover charter schools, millions meant for classrooms go to constant recruitment and training.

Myth-Busting:
Examining Charter Claims

MYTH #1: "Charter schools get better test scores"

REALITY: Stanford's research shows NO difference in achievement between charter lottery winners and losers. The students who apply to charters do better regardless of whether they attend—it's about family motivation, not school quality.

MYTH #2: "Charters serve all students equally"

REALITY: Data shows charters systematically underserve:

  • Special education: 50% fewer students with severe disabilities
  • English learners: 10% in public schools vs 5% in charters
  • Example: Albany Community Charter School served 0% English learners while the district served 11%

MYTH #3: "Charters are more innovative"

REALITY: Their "innovations" are often just:

  • Longer school days (teacher burnout)
  • Rigid discipline (student pushout)
  • Test prep focus (narrowed curriculum)
  • Computer-based learning (cost-cutting)

MYTH #4: "Charters are held accountable"

REALITY:

  • Only 3% close for academic failure
  • Failed charters operate an average of 6.2 years before closing
  • When they do close, 2,000+ students scrambled for new schools in Western NY alone

The Enrollment Scandal: How They Cherry-Pick

Documented tactics to filter out "undesirable" students:
  • Applications only in English
  • Requirements for parent essays and interviews
  • Mandatory volunteer hours (screening out working families)
  • Not providing free lunch programs
  • One charter even required parents to invest in the company that built the school

ACLU Investigation: Found 250 California charter schools using illegal enrollment practices to exclude low-income students and English learners.

Following the Corporate Money Trail

Where public education funds really go in charter schools:
  • Management company fees (often 15-20% off the top)
  • Real estate deals with board member-owned companies
  • Marketing and recruitment (competing for students)
  • Executive salaries (some near $1 million)
  • Profit margins for EMO shareholders

Meanwhile: Teachers buy supplies with their own money and buildings deteriorate.

The Ultimate Betrayal

Charter School Reality for Teachers:

Al Shanker saw what his idea had become before he died in 1997. He warned that charter schools were becoming "a vehicle for privatization" and worried they would increase segregation. He was right.

His vision: Teacher-led innovation for the hardest-to-serve students The reality: Corporate chains that push out challenging students

His dream: Collaboration to lift all schools The reality: Competition that destroys public schools

His legacy: Twisted into everything he fought against

The Bottom Line

After 30+ years and billions in public investment, charter schools have failed to deliver on every major promise:

  • Higher achievement (no significant difference)
  • Innovation (just longer days and harsh discipline)
  • Equity (increased segregation)
  • Accountability (less transparent than public schools)
  • Teacher empowerment (burnout and exodus)